The Old Lincoln School in Brookline, Massachusetts, has been exquisitely transformed into an installation of cinematic scenes that evoke the world of Macbeth. You, the audience, have the freedom to roam the environment and experience a sensory journey as you choose what to watch and where to go. Rediscover the childlike excitement of exploring the unknown in this unique theatrical adventure.
Sleep No More
An abandoned school. Shakespeare’s fallen hero. Hitchcock’s shadow of suspense.
Award-winning British theater company Punchdrunk makes its U.S. debut with Sleep No More, an immersive production inspired by Shakespeare’s Macbeth, told through the lens of a Hitchcock thriller.
In the News
Wicked Local Brookline: ...we’re in uncharted territory here, with an offbeat and immersive theater experience that’s part art installation, part haunted house, part macabre ballet, and part Macbethian nightmare.
guardian.co.uk: The pumpkins are out on the street in Massachusetts and the shops are full of Halloween. But if there's one thing that's likely to spook out Bostonians this autumn it's the arrival of British theatre company Punchdrunk.
Variety review: Theatergoers often hear the expression "entering the world of the play," but few will have experienced anything like "Sleep Mo More" when it comes to total audience immersion.
EDGE Boston: Part haunted house, part art installation, part Art Decoed Jacobean melodrama, Sleep No More is far more than a theatrical gimmick -- this is immersion theater taken to level of high art.
Boston Globe review: In eerie ‘Sleep No More,' the audience wanders through the Bard's bloody business
Theatermania: A.R.T.'s new artistic director Diane Paulus is committed to moving theater forward and challenging audiences.
The Boston Globe: Imagine you're walking through an alley behind an abandoned school. You pass a deserted playground, scale a flight of metal stairs, and enter the building through a rear door on the second story...
Video review of Punchdrunk's "hotly-awaited" production It Felt Like a Kiss in Manchester, England.
Creators
Directed and devised by
Felix Barrett and Maxine Doyle, with the Company
| CAST | |
| Duncan | Phil Atkins |
| Malcolm | Hector Harkness |
| Macbeth | Geir Hytten |
| Banquo | Vinicius Salles |
| Macduff | Robert McNeill |
| Porter | Thomas Kee |
| Lady Macbeth | Sarah Dowling |
| Lady Macduff | Alli Ross |
| Witch | Conor Doyle |
| Witch | Stephanie Eaton |
| Witch | Fernanda Prata |
| Hecate | Careena Melia |
| The Second Mrs. de Winter | Poornima Kirby |
| Mrs. Danvers | Tori Sparks |
| Bellhop | Alexander LaFrance |
| Annie Darcy | Annie Goodchild |
| Elsie Price | Hayley Jane Soggin |
| Man in Bar | Robert Najarian |
| CAST (From November 10) | |
| Duncan | Phil Atkins |
| Malcolm | Robert Najarian |
| Macbeth | Eric Jackson-Bradley |
| Banquo | Jeffery Lyon |
| Macduff | Luke Murphy |
| Porter | Thomas Kee |
| Lady Macbeth | Tori Sparks |
| Lady Macduff | Alli Ross |
| Witch | Jordan Morley |
| Witch | Stephanie Eaton |
| Witch | Kelly Bartnik |
| Hecate | Careena Melia |
| The Second Mrs. de Winter | Poornima Kirby |
| Mrs. Danvers | Hope T. Davis |
| Bellhop | Alexander LaFrance |
| Annie Darcy | Annie Goodchild |
| Elsie Price | Hayley Jane Soggin |
| THE ANNIE DARCY BAND | |
| Bass/Sax | Timo Shanko |
| Drums | Django Carranza |
| Piano | Rusty Scott |
| CREDITS | |
| Director and Designer | Felix Barrett |
| Director and Choreographer | Maxine Doyle |
| Sound and Graphic Designer | Stephen Dobbie |
| Associate Designer | Livi Vaughan |
| Associate Designer | Beatrice Minns |
| Costumer | David Israel Reynoso |
| Staff Director | Mikhael Tara Garver |
| Assistant Director | Paul Stacey |
| Stage Manager | Carolyn Rae Boyd |
| PRODUCING TEAM |
|
| Executive Director (Punchdrunk) | Colin Marsh |
| Senior Producer (Punchdrunk) | Colin Nightingale |
| Technical Director (Punchdrunk) | Euan Maybank |
| Producer (A.R.T.) | Diane Borger |
| Line Producer (A.R.T.) | Chris De Camillis |
| Assistant Producer | Allison Kline |
| Props Volunteer Coordinator | Olivia Benowitz |
| PRODUCTION STAFF | |
| Production Manager | Pat Quinlan |
| Associate Production Manager | Chris Viklund |
| Associate Production Manager | Skip Curtiss |
| Technical Director | Steve Setterlun |
| Assistant Technical Director | Nick Fouch |
| Acting Assistant Technical Director | David Buckler |
| Scenic Charge Artist | Gerard P. Vogt |
| Assistant Scenic Charge | Kristin Knutson |
| Scenic Painter | Katie Richmond |
| Master Carpenter | |
| Scenic Carpenters | Jason Bryant |
| York-Andreas Paris | |
| Scenic Interns | Ben Clark |
| Sarah Pierce | |
| Katie Wilson | |
| Rena Luczkiewicz | |
| Paint Interns | Tacy Flaherty |
| Rebecca Keithley | |
| Abigail Neuhoff | |
| Scenic Staff | Alan Boyer |
| Stephen “Dex” Woodward | |
| George Kane | |
| Tom Ibbitson | |
| Irene Yee | |
| Kayla Szumowski | |
| Lee Czemba | |
| Lane Black | |
| Dan Black | |
| Tim Boland | |
| Andrew Remillard | |
| Olivia Brownlee | |
| Erin Gilligan | |
| James Crosby | |
| Karina Shorten | |
| John Hardin | |
| Properties Manager | Cindy Lee-Sullivan |
| Assistant Properties Manager | Tricia Green |
| Properties Carpenter | Stacey Horne |
| Properties Staff | Rebecca Helgeson |
| Brittany Burke | |
| Sean Cote | |
| Meagan Miller-McKeever | |
| Properties Interns | Jeff Desautels |
| Brian Hoefling | |
| Katie Flemming | |
| Costume Shop Manager | Jeannette Hawley |
| Assistant Costume Shop Manager | Hilary Gately |
| Costume Drapers | Carmel Dundon |
| Mary Hurd | |
| Stitchers | Tova Moreno |
| Jennifer Guadagno | |
| Crafts Artisan | David Israel Reynoso |
| Hair and Make-up | Rachel Padula Shufelt |
| Master Electrician | Derek Wiles |
| Lighting Assistant | Ken Helvig |
| Lighting Engineer | David Oppenheimer |
| Audio Supervisor | David Remedios |
| Audio Engineer | Katrina McGuire |
| Audio Staff | Meghan McDonough |
| Jason Van Sleet | |
| Alexis Rodriguez-Carlson | |
| Darby Smotherman | |
| Assistant Stage Manager | Kyle Carlson |
| Assistant Stage Manager | Alexandra McConnell-Trivelli |
| Sound Intern | Sarah Weintraub |
| Band Contractor/Bar Manager | Jason Waddleton |
| Stage Supervisor | Jeremie Lozier |
| Production Assistants | Chris Eschenbach |
| Kevin Klein | |
| Matthew Sebastian | |
| Wardrobe Supervisor | Steven Drueke |
| VOLUNTEERS | |
| Scenic | Bryan Atterberry, John Hardin, Katie Richmond, Angela Mussacchio, Jeannette Vivas, Jaycee Do, Anna Oliver, Michael Berman, Evan Cole, Ariel Miller, Stephanie Lederman, Veronika Kruta, Larry Switzky |
| Props/Detail | Anna Oliver, Elyssa Jakim, Zachary Baker-Salmon, Robin McGuire, Lindsay Boss, Juliana Beecher, Evan Cole, Marghuerite White, Maia Laperle, Melanie Garber, Karen Kosco, Ariel Miller, Julia Bloom, Danielle Drees, Angela Mussacchio, Scarlett Redmond, Ian DeLeon, Kara Stokowski, Scott Hadley, Molly Lanzarotta, Luis Santos, Justin Tease, Beth Fagan, Patrick Mills, Mark Collett, Sydney Robinson, Madeline Barr, Anna Brownsted, Samara Scott, Chelsea Barrett, Julia Rocha |
| War-room installation and special projects: | Maria Magdalena Campos Pons and the students of her School of the Museum of Fine Arts Installation Art class: |
| Susan Childress, Shannon Carroll, Olivia Becker, Alaina Gurdak, Alex Rathbun, Maddie Barr, Anna O’Hara, Sofia Botero, Ani Avnian, Eunice Choi, Doyle Bley, Esther Chung, Eusaem Choy, George Oliveira, Ivette Slaom, James Lyman, Natalia Vergara, C. Fisher, Katrina Neumann | |
| Lighting | Nicole Barron, Evan Cole, John Harrison, John Bechtold |
| Sound | Bryan Atterberry, Mary Simpson, Max Lord |
Non-Required Reading
Rachel Hutt interviews Sleep No More director Felix Barrett
Sara Bookin-Weiner introduces the excitement and adventure of Punchdrunk and Sleep No More
Artistic Director Diane Paulus introduces the Shakespeare Exploded! festival
Downloads
Performance Dates:
Part of:
Venue:
Need to know:
Wear the black masks in Sleep No More — sign up to become a Steward



Comments
Christ on ice - if you live
Christ on ice - if you live in Massachusetts, buy a ticket for this NOW. Punchdrunk gave me two of the wildest nights of my life.
Wear sneakers!
Fantastic show! I will certainly see it again. Word to the wise: Do NOT dress up for this! I made the mistake of wearing low, comfortable heels. You'll want running shoes.
Sleep No More
As in the Donkey Show, Sleep No More leaves an impression that the ART's financial struggles continue. In Donkey Show, the performers were amateurish dancers [who could not have cost much money]; in Sleep No More there were some guides, who actually did not seem to know much about the process, and one rather awkwardly simulated sex act.; but no actors, as such, seem to have been hired. Many rooms in the school were decorated in various ways, all of them quite dark. I walked through every room. There were no instructions for the patrons, who seemed to wander aimlessly in different directions, so, if some silent narrative were being attempted, it would only have been by very unlikely happenstance that a person might have proceeded through all the rooms in some sensible, drama-creating sequence. An analogy might be made to a regular theater that had no money to hire a cast for a certain show, but they did have enough funds to prepare stage scenery. The curtain would raise before the seated audience which would view a well-designed stage set. The curtain then would lower, and after a moment, be raised again to display another scene, and then lower again and the curtain would slowly go up and down, displaying a number of different stage designs but an actor would never appear. The environment was sort of like a haunted house [although I have never been in one] that relied entirely on atmosphere because there were no moving displays, not even any skeletons that jumped out and said, "Boo!"
I Think you missed it Tony.
Seems like you didn't quite get it Tony. To find the story you have to follow one of the Actors / Dancers that you seemed to have missed. like anything good in life you get back what you put in, If you go with an attitude like this you will certainly miss the point.
Re: Sleep No More
Dear Tony,
I believe you are misunderstanding the essence of the show and the message the creators deliver to the audience. If you'd like skeletons to jump at you, please take time to visit a haunted house for your first time just to get an idea what is the difference between Sleep No More and scary rooms. If you need directions about HOW to wander around the building, perhaps you might need an IQ test. Finally, if there are truly reasonable and argumentative offers on your part on how to improve or better budget future shows at ART, please feel free to propose.
This misses the point entirely!
I have never expereienced anything quite so fantastic as the intensely detailed set-installations of Sleep No More. The true beauty of discovering the incredibly rendered sets on your own, and the poetic action taking place inside, is unparalleled in "traditional" theatre. The amazing sets, lights, soundscape, and smell-scape envelope the "audience" to such a level that you are totally transported. A true gift. I have never felt more wonder at any show. Or any haunted house, for that matter. Amazing.
Comment and Sleep No More
Mr. Carleton, You obviously: 1- Didn't care enough to follow and engage in the scenes which are some of the most extraordinary and breath taking moments I personally (and the friends I was with) have experienced in the theatre in quite some time. 2- Ignored the program as there are around 18 professional dancers and actors in this show including British cast members. and 3- In reference to your financial comment- How much do you think paying a cast that large, and the meticulous set details of 40-some rooms could have cost..I'm guessing quite a bit. More than a regular show I bet. The show is nothing short of thrilling.If you wanted to be spoon fed a show, you should have stayed home and watched tv.
This theatrical experience
This theatrical experience was so obviously UTTERLY WASTED on you. So many others (here and overseas) would have traded places with you in a blink of an eye to be part of the experience. Next time, stay home and watch some comfortable, uninspiring TV.
I agree with Tony
This production is heavy on atmosphere and light on acting and narrative. Fact is, nobody can possibly tell what is going on. Disjointed scenes with no beginning or end, no matter how well done, do not really convey specific meaning of any kind. Narrative is needed to for intent to ultimately translate into art in the viewer's mind. No matter what is meant here, the result is a jumble. Doubt me? Well, what if my comment was delivered in the same vein as the production? Would you know what I meant? Give it a shot: "Fact is, nobody of any kind. is heavy on going on. Disjointed for intent to ultimately and light on acting and is needed to end, no matter art in the viewer's, the result how well done, on atmosphere and light needed to for intent..." ***Get the picture?*** Punchdrunk are selling the Emperor's New Clothes. Meaning is meaning. Theater is not a music video.
Response to "Othello"
My good man, regarding the claim that this disjointed story made no sense: The thing about Shakespeare is, it's part of common culture. You can do Shakespeare like this because any even slightly educated theater audience should know the story. So the plot is secondary. Go read up on your Shakespeare and go back.
I find it really interesting
I find it really interesting that the poster above assumes that theatre must have a linear narrative to have meaning. How much of this is fact and how much personal preference?
<br>
If you love musicals and hate straight plays, does that mean that all theatre must have songs? I personally could live without seeing another kitchen-sink drama ever again - does that make it non-theatre? For me, it's my preference to watch non-linear, movement-heavy theatre, but it doesn't make liner, straight-acting theatre "bad" by virtue of its category.
<br>
So if anyone's reading beyond just getting and giving opinions, why should (or shouldn't) theatre have an easy-to-follow, defineable narrative? Why is/isn't that a necessary characteristic that makes something "theatre"?
Question for Discussion
I find it really interesting that the poster above assumes that theatre must have a linear narrative to have meaning. How much of this is fact and how much personal preference?
<br>
If you love musicals and hate straight plays, does that mean that all theatre must have songs? I personally could live without seeing another kitchen-sink drama ever again - does that make it non-theatre? For me, it's my preference to watch non-linear, movement-heavy theatre, but it doesn't make linear, straight-acting theatre "bad" by virtue of its category.
<br>
So if anyone's reading beyond just getting and giving opinions, why should (or shouldn't) theatre have an easy-to-follow, definable narrative? Why is/isn't that a necessary characteristic that makes something "theatre"?
Missing the Point with The Donkey Show
To Tony,
One either understands theater as an evolving, collaborative art form that has remained uniquely necessary because of its live audience and the potential for interaction - or one doesn't. You obviously don't.
Rather than opine publicly about people and subjects which you know relatively little, better to do your research and perhaps take an acting class or one on theater history -you might learn something.
As with Sleep No More, you obviously missed the point with The Donkey Show. The environment is evocative of Studio 54 in it's heyday and if you know anything about the disco era, you would know that Studio 54 was the absolute zenith and epitome of club culture at the time. I repeat 'club' not ballet. The dancers at Studio 54 were not classically 'trained', they were club busboys/go-go dancers as well as a wild mix of high-brow and low-brow patrons who wanted to let go and be somebody else for a night. This is the kind of experience The Donkey Show evokes in its audience. In order to marry Shakespeare with a club environment, however, you cannot possibly understand the skill level necessary for the performers involved.
Calling the performers "amateurish" in The Donkey Show means you obviously have no idea of the skill level it takes to sing and dance in a vigorous show within a totally immersive environment. An environment that is completely different each night because the performer is surrounded by the audience.
You have no idea of the level of training it takes for an actor to play more than role and to improvise directly with audience members night after night. Nor do you know about the skill involved in neck-breaking quick changes or the acting ability needed for a woman to play a man - or two men, as the case may be! The precision and attention to detail needed to execute each lift, jump and piece of choreography in this somewhat dangerous show, and to make it look spontaneous each night! - all while surrounded by audience members who are dancing, drinking and otherwise engaged and to protect them, as well as your castmates, in the process.
As an actor, I would like to invite you to audition for The Donkey Show, or for Punchdrunk, and a) see how far you would get b) learn exactly what it is you speak of. Until you've walked the years in our shoes that it takes for an actor to be a professional and execute shows of these types as skillfully as these people do, I suggest you keep your mouth closed and your eyes and ears open - you might learn something.
See you on the boards.
Tony, Donkey Show and Sleep No More
I disagree with Tony's claims, but I must say- I've seen both shows now and I must admit, the level of artistry in Sleep No More far exceeds Donkey Show. There is no doubt those performers are working very hard and have much to deal with in the nightclub setting. I just wasn't taken in by the performances. The singing (and sometimes shouting) was over a karaoke sounding track which was odd as it made me feel as though the performers were not trusted to sing well enough. I was enthralled by Sleep No More though and the incredible performances within it.I plan to return and see it again! Bravo Punckdrunk and A.R.T.
Most Incredible!
We came home and immediately bought 4 more tickets. This is such an amazing experience and truly the best of interactive theatre.
Sleep No More
I attended alone,(I often attend plays and movies alone) but I recommend attending with your partner or a group of friends. I parked in the wrong garage, got lost and wondered around for 40 minutes looking for the place, Once I arrived I walked smack into a wall in a dark hall, so I wasn't in the greatest mood. After I had a drink and entered with the group I had a blast and intend to attend again. Hints and Tips: Get there in time to have a drink and relax before the show begins. Wear sneakers. Check your handbag and coat, it's like a sauna. Attend with a group of friends and split up, rendevous back in the bar on a regular basis and compare notes. Great fun! Loved it.
A Stimulating Night at the Theatre
My date and I had an incredible experience at Sleep No More last night. This was a beautiful, complex, challenging piece that was brilliantly layered and endlessly fascinating. Wondering around that abandoned school, I felt as though I was observing lost spirits from some parallel noir reality. I can easily see how one could view this show several times and have a completely difference experience depending on which part of the story the audience member choose to follow. This is not like a regular night at the theatre, if you are going to see this show, come prepared to be a living, breathing, part of it. This is truly one of the most unique interpretations of Shakespeare's work that I have ever seen and I can't wait to return with an even bigger group.
Sleep No More
yes. kinda like "EYES WIDE SHUT"
the Tom Cruise Movie with Nicole Kidman.
Wow. Just wow.
Be ready for a challenge - non-linear, non-spoon-fed, non-easy theatre that you must be willing to engage and discover on your own. The environment is at first eerily deserted, then a character strides past on some urgent mission. Follow them. Wear your comfortable shoes. Check your coat. Be willing to run if you have to catch up - with your legs and with your brain. The rooms/sets are not always the same - there are things on a second trip through the halls that weren't there the first time - other places vanish entirely. The choreography and blocking clearly owes a lot to contact improv and a set of highly skilled and very committed professional actors who are intimately aware of their own bodies and each others'. Smell is part of the experience. A room full of trees, a room full of hair, a room full of dirt. The sound of your own feet on gravel, trying to find the bathtubs again, two women locked in a silent battle of wills. And finally, emerging into a speakeasy, with a marcel-waved singer crooning "If You Believe in Me" and elaborate cocktails in elegant little glasses. If you need your theatre linear, spelled-out, easy to understand and set clearly in front of you, there are some fine programs on Hulu.com. But if you're up for a dare - dare big and Sleep No More.
Exhilarating Macbeth
I saw the premier on Thursday night and am still digesting it. The entire experience was surreal. The elaborate sets and the actors' performances in various rooms was disorienting -- in a good way. I felt like I was visiting a museum from the 1930's which had been shuttered until now. Except that there were actors and actresses performing around me, and references to the 1500's and Macbeth. The bar which begins and ends the show is a clever idea. My favorite area was the Collector's Room, and the two-headed skeleton. Overall, Sleep No More was exhilarating and mysterious at the same time. Congratulations to Diane Paulus and the ART for its courage in staging this. Bravo!
Restoring my faith
I've been a big ART detractor for a lot of years now. "Sleep No More" is a violent, necessary shove in the right direction. This is a theater experience, and one that is not to be missed. I walked in blind, not knowing what to expect... I walked around blind, not knowing what would happen next... I didn't leave QUITE as blind, because I knew I experienced something wholly unique and incredible. I've got three pieces of advice for people who are thinking of going: 1) GO. 2) Go blissfully ignorant, and dismiss any preconceived notions of the play on which it's based. 3) Be ready for anything. Go with the flow. If you're lucky, you will see pieces of the show that very few others will see that night. Its a truly special, incredible experience. To ART and Punchdrunk - Bravo. Keep it up. This is exactly what Boston needs to break out of an original theatre rut.
INCREDIBLE!!
I experienced the theatrical sensation that names itself Sleep No More last night in Brookline. As a local theatre artist, I commend the A.R.T. and Punchdrunk for creating magic. I don't think I've ever experience something much like it. Daring, risk-taking, emotional, immersible and insecure to mention a few. CONGRATULATIONS for continuing to WoW audiences and sharing this work of art locally. BrAvO!!!!
Stunning
Absolutely amazing event. Incredibly dense theatrical experience, I can't imagine the effort that went into setting up the entire building as an interactive maze. Exhausting but more than worth the effort. I'm making a list of people I must bring back. Brilliant, brilliant work.
GO SEE THIS SHOW.
Just got home from seeing the show. One of the most amazing pieces of theatre I've seen in years. STUNNING.
Sleepless in Brookline
You won't wake up from Sleep until a couple of days later when you realize you have no idea what you just experienced or why you are still experiencing it.
It's too big for 1 night. It's like an entirely new language that you need to work on to get it. But this is the beauty of art. It moves you. I think theatre is experience. And this is pure. Some thing we so really need to walk thru. We so rarely have a chance in life to get out of our lives like Sleep offers. Don't Miss It!
Unforgettable
We took a large group of 16-20 year old students to Sleep No More on Saturday night and they were still talking about it 24 hours later, piecing together the movements of Macbeth, Lady Macbeth, Macduff, Banquo and the others. Each attendee had a different experience and was able to interact with the space, the performers and the storyline in a very particular way.
The set is elaborate, atmospheric and incredibly detailed, the actors athletic and inviting. The soundscape as you move through the space is an artwork in and of itself. The smells are sometimes overwhelming. As a spectator/performer you are a sort of ghost who can observe and perhaps vaguely effect some of the action. You may wander through the space, chase after a scene or settle down for some private time with an actor. I had a bizarre, private card game with a handsome young barkeep who kissed my hand when we were done. A few minutes a bar fight erupted and the space, which had previously held two of us, now held 50 or more.
Our group was only in town for the weekend. If I lived in Boston I would purchase tickets again immediately.
Sleep no more, please move this review
Please move the review by Tony Carleton further down so that it is not the first to be read by visitors. It is an out rider.
Re: Sleep no more, please move this review
The A.R.T. values transparency on our website and blog and we appreciate the contributions of our audience members' diverse viewpoints. For this reason, we are reluctant to meddle with audience comments on the site, and only do so on rare occasions after very careful consideration. In this case, we won't be making any adjustments to the order of the comments on this page. Please feel free to contact me directly at amanda_gutowski@harvard.edu if you have any questions.
Amanda Gutowski
Communications Manager, A.R.T.
Unreal
I do not usually attend theater, however, Sleep No More has totally changed my outlook. I have never in been a space that made me feel so uneasy but alive. It felt like I was inside a movie and allowed to explore each scene as much as I wanted without being forced to move on too quickly. I opened drawers and found hidden love letters. I stood in the middle of a forest and breathed in the smell. I picked up mulch off the ground and crumbled it in my fingers. I stood next to a cradle and stared at a lump of cloth. This all took place inside a Brookline school. I was taken away. And I've already bought my ticket to return.
Sleep No More disappoints
I went to Sleep No More with great excitement. I trusted de A.R.T. and Punchdrunk to produce an intelligent and meaningful experience. I came out very surprised at the fundamental lack of understanding of the essence of Macbeth, which lies in the SEQUENCE in which the events take place. The first assassination can lead only to the ones that follow in a cycle of bloodshed that is doomed to end, like all tragedies, in self destruction.
Imagine my surprise when at the essence of the production lies a lack of sequencing. The fundamental idea of Punchdrunk and the beauty of the environmental design, the music and the staging merits a play written for this form or one that fundamentally serves de central ideas of a play.
I came out with a great desire to stand at the exit and ask the people not familiar with Macbeth what the experience was all about, thinking that this central idea was the last thing they took with them. In the interest of attracting a younger crowd we should not succumb to today's popular formula of empty sophisticated forms, with food and drinks. Matt Haimovitz has kept it honest and truly great by radically changing venues and the way in which classical music is presented, but not by re-writing the great classical works of music. His success in attracting younger generations is the example to follow.
Preconceptions should be left at the door
The sequence of events in a written text is only one possibility, as directors such as Brook (who reordered his Hamlet) will attest. When you are moving into areas of dreamlike non-linear narrative such as that of Punchdrunk's shows then the sequence is not of logical progression and looking for it suggests a lack of understanding of the audience's role here.
This production is not called Macbeth, if you want to see Macbeth then go and see a production called Macbeth. The essence, and a particular interpretation of Macbeth is here though, so it is called 'Sleep No More' instead.
I'm travelling from the UK next week to see the show (and for a nice break in New England). Any other Brits listening in?
The sequence exists. It's circular not linear.
Yes the events in McB are sequenced but so are the events in "Sleep no more" It is just more cyclical. Where else can you go to see a play in which you get a different persons perspective with each cycle. It's like one of those old "choose your own adventure" books from the 80's. Who ever you choose to follow will be the "narrator" for you story. This Production is just amazing. I never thought that you could produce a "real time" play in this way. They have planned this out and perfected every detail down to the lighting and music that almost follows you. The one thing that I wish they had was dialogue. It would help with the story. I left with so many questions. I actually had trouble sleeping afterwards because I couldn't get my head around what I just saw. Bravo Punchdrunk and ART.
Confusing, Ambiguous Experience
The "Sleep No More" experience was one of confusion and ambiguity for me. I'm familiar with the play and with plenty of Shakespeare since I've been an English teacher for numerous years now and was an English major in college. Very appreciative of the arts from the time I was a teenager (age 40 now). But this experience was at times frustrating and confusing. Perhaps I should not have gone after a long day standing on my feet at work. Perhaps I should not have felt that I deserved at least SOME guidance, including a warning that I'd be separated from my friends for the ENTIRE NIGHT. That was disappointing to say the least since I wanted to discuss things with them but had no warning that I'd never see them again for 3 hours. I had no cell phone on me and no talking/noises allowed anyway. Disillusioning. I don't need to be spoon-fed by any means, and I am always up for something new and fresh. But this experience was a tad ridiculous. No warnings and no heads-up. My feet hurt after two hours on them and my shoulder killed from carrying a heavy purse. I could not find the folks I came with for hours and at one point wondered how I'd get home. I also ran into others who'd been separated from their friends and were not able to enjoy themselves. Preparation would've been good. I'm very familiar with Shakespeare AND Hitchcock, and even I didn't have a clue what some of the rooms or scenes were trying to convey. If you do nothing all day, have loads of energy, and don't care if you understand what you're seeing (or if you're seeing it with anyone you know), then you'll have a grand time at "Sleep No More." Otherwise, forget it and hear about it from someone who already went. This way you'll get to save your feet. A bonus. I've lived and travelled all over the U.S. and Europe, have a great appreciation for the arts, and have a master's degree. So lack of intelligence and experience is not my problem. I just didn't care for this show.
RE: Confusing
RE: Confusing Ambiguous...
Sounds like you spent the majority of the time worrying about your friends and missed the show. Also, do you usually talk to your friends during a play? Do you usually text and talk on the phone during a play? Then why should the fact that you cannot talk and use your cell to talk during this show be disallusioning... ? You also failed to look into how this company and kind of show works. There are many warnings to wear sensible shoes etc... Not only that, the various articles about this show have given a "heads up" regarding the nature of this show.
Congratulations to the A.R.T. on a fantastic production.
Reply to Cathryn
I enjoyed it very much- you seem like one of those high matainece types that has no imaingation and everything has to be spponfed to you. I for one am glad there was no talking or cellphones-, beause you are the type of person I hate being near in a theater, the one that thinks they are so smart and must talk about adnd analize everything just to prove to everyone you read the book. UGH! Do all of us a favor and just stay home and watch Masterpiece Theater and so all the conditions will be to your liking and expectations - I guess at the age of 40 you can't handle anything new, different or interesting. Jeeze what a cry baby and whinrer you are- I bet your frieneds just ditched you.
Hey, I'm in my forties!
Hey, I'm in my forties!
It's not an age thing, I know of many people my age and older who can't get enough of visceral experiences like this. I just hope my body keeps up for another four decades at least.
I also despair of people who insist on talking in the theatre, whether eighteen or eighty!
Run, Don't Walk
to see this viscerally gripping and visually stunning immersive re-imagining of Mabeth and Rebecca. I was so involved in the suspense that I found myself breathlessly running after the different characters full of excitement, but also trepidation, to discover what happened next.
The movement was glorious and at times, almost overwhelming, in it's animal ferocity.
One of the most intense and fulfilling experiences I have ever had at the theatre. I can't wait to go back again!
Just in time for Halloween?
Just in time for Halloween? A haunted house for adults? Telling people to have a drink before seeing the show?
I only got to see 1 hours
I only got to see 1 hours worth of the performance and saw acts that I recognized from the actual play. If you think this production is confusing, disjointed, or not in sequential order then you got it! You are supposed to piece this together like a puzzle and figure out who the characters are, what scenes you are watching, and see what they've done with it. It is a Macbeth inspired play not Macbeth itself so don't go expecting to see what you know as Macbeth in it's exact form. Instead go looking to explore and be part of this incredible world that Punchdrunk has created. Put your expectations of theatre as you know it aside and explore like a child. If you can't do this you might be a bit of a stick in the mud.
Stunning
Macbeth takes place continuously and eternally in time. Play back play forward. Amazing. Macbeth for everytime/place/person
Only question of concern was about the health of the eel
In regards ro your inquiry
In regards ro your inquiry concerning the health of our eel: He's quite healthy. He has a very particular feeding/water changing regimen and is under continuous surveilance during the show. I assure you, he's quite content being a part of Sleep No More. He hopes you will come again soon.
Wemissed what the critic saw...
We went to the same performance that Don Aucoin, the Globe reviewer, went to, and we walked around the space for about 2 hours (as he did). We knew going in that we had to find out for ourselves what the show was about, and we know Macbeth very well indeed...yet we ended up feeling that we had, regrettably, not seen much of anything. My wife asked, "In what way is this THEATER?" We were in every room in the place several times, but 90% of the time they were empty...so we waited in some rooms for something to happen, or we wandered around and tried to make sense out of the furnishings, the props, etc. In the course of our time there, we saw exactly 3 moments involving actors: The dead Duncan (I assume) lying in the bed where he must have been murdered, then wrapped and carried into a chapel; during this time Lady Macbeth (I assume) fondled the face of the corpse lovingly. Later, in what appeared to be a school dormitory with mostly empty beds, Lady Macbeth wandered through--I guess our mistake was not to follow her for the rest of evening. Later, on our second visit to a room filled with pine trees, we saw Birnam wood march to Dunsinane. We never saw the actor playing Macbeth (whose photo was in the Globe review, and we never saw about 80% of the incidents that Don Aucoin mentioned. I have no problem looking around or following a non-sequential series of incidents in a plot (that's no problem after reading Faulkner's "The Sound and the Fury"--which is, of course, a reference to Macbeth), but we felt that at least a LITTLE bit of guidance would have been very welcome--some kind of indication when and where something was going to happen, since we waited in a number of empty rooms and saw--nothing. I am amazed to read all the reports here by people who had a fantastic time....and I regret that I seem to have wasted my time and money for the most part. As a hint to people who read this and haven't yet seen the show, you may want to be much more active in looking through the rooms briefly and hunting down the places where things are actually happening. If nothing is going on where you are, go somewhere else. And when you do find something happening, it seems to be worth following it to whatever end there is before looking for something else.
you've summed it up
you've summed it up beautifully. your mistake was in not following lady macbeth.
not following lady macbeth
There were a few scenes that I happened upon and they were beautiful but I just couldn't make myself follow the actors like the papparrazi -- masked audience members just swarmed after the actors to follow, ironically, the sequence, and they trampled on anyone in the way. It was ugly. I think the masks made them act and look like vultures. I would have loved this if there was a less competitive way of watching. I might write more about this later, but it was, in the end, the audience that drew most of my attention.
I, too, was turned off by the
I, too, was turned off by the crowds following the main characters, but dealt with it by following one of the minor characters instead. I still managed to see many of the main scenes. On my second visit, I parked myself in one particular room for awhile to be sure I'd see a scene I knew I'd missed before.
I guess I'm not understanding
I guess I'm not understanding why everyone who had a bad time at the show is contributing it to a lack of "guidance." I've never before been to ANY type of theatrical production where someone has told me, "okay... this will happen next, and then this will happen, and oh - make sure to look at this character's facial expression and definitely be sure to focus on the right side of the stage during this scene." I'm just stunned at the helplessness of some of the people who've commented on the show.
And in regard to not being able to see a lot of what the actual actors were doing... you have to understand that YOU are just as much of an actor as they are. YOU can do the exact same things that they do and interact within the same environment (minus the nudity, of course). This is your world too... everyone inhabits it together.
Perhaps you didn't notice that you were in a school and not a theater? There are no seats, you know. Your ticket says "General Admission" instead of a specific row and seat number.
The bottom line is that this isn't typical theater. Be independent. Explore.
Love, love, loved it!
I went Saturday night and I'm going again this week and prolly next as well. It is the most exciting interactive performance theatre I have ever experienced in my 30+ years of theatre going. I'm going back for many reasons; I missed rooms the first time, I want to look at the sets/rooms in more detail (they are exquisite) and it's just so incredible...multiple floors, multiple rooms/sets, action taking place in many places at once...just brilliant! And the speakeasy, The Manderley, was a real treat with a live jazz trio and two incredibly talented singers that are worth the ticket price in their own right. Absolutely the best avante garde theatre, full stop. Kudos to the new ART director! Keep up the brilliance. I look forward to more.
As someone who has been very
As someone who has been very involved in theatre for more than half of their life, I have to say that this is perhaps one of the most thrilling pieces of theatre that I have EVER experienced. It's challenging, engaging, and more insightful into the psychology of perhaps one of the most psychologically intriguing characters ever written. I have studied this play in and out and found myself discovering very new points of view to these characters. If you want a passive piece of theatre, go elsewhere. If you are closed-minded, skittish, and curmudgeonly, go elsewhere. Or actually... DO GO, get over yourself and experience something new and thrilling. But be warned, you WILL get tired, your feet MIGHT start to hurt, and you will have to give up some control over the situation. This is not passive theatre. Also, this piece is like the Louvre... you can't go through the whole thing and absorb it on one trip. I've gone twice, but still have a myriad of discoveries to make in Punchdrunk's mad labyrinth. PS: MacBeth got some blood on me, so I have a bone to pick with him, and those prop people need a year's paid vacation!!
Great Night at the Show
Another great showw has come to kick boring and proper bostonians in
their nethers. This is NOT Macbeth, this is Sleep No More, please wear comfortable shoes and have an open mind. During my 2 plus hours, I
visited every room on 4 floors AND saw enough of the show to see my favorite scenes twice...the blue ballroom dance scene and the dinner on stage. I also saw at least another half dozen plus scenes that I walked in on as they started and followed several characters around, but found it more to my liking to happen upon the action. Will you see the whole play?
Probably not...but you will see a piece of theater that you are part of.
Please keep up the great work, saw it saturday with a friend, we split immediately but met up several times. Going to see it again with more friends.
if this performance is
if this performance is anything like "The Masque of the Red Death" the Punchdrunk Theatre Co did in London (which it looks like it is), then i HIGHLY suggest going to this!! Absolutely amazing and a one of a kind experience for sure! My advice is if you're with a group, trying to stay together through the whole thing will put you at a disadvantage so stick with one or two other people at the most and meet up with the others at the end. We actually dressed up for the performance in London and we were fine, but perhaps it is difference in this space? I would also suggest reading Macbeth beforehand, but it is certainly not required.
Post new comment